Agency documentary pathway

Australian Energy Infrastructure Commissioner

This page records the AEIC's consideration of the Beneficiary's historical complaint, its reliance on EPA Victoria's stated regulatory position, and the Trustee's later provision of documentary material for administrative-record purposes.

Capacity distinction: The 2025 complaint correspondence was addressed to the Beneficiary. The later 2026 correspondence was issued by LEWIS TROJAN HORSE PTY LTD as Trustee of the Owen Robert Inter Vivos Trust. The two phases are presented separately and are not treated as the same capacity.
Role and scope

What this pathway records

The AEIC is presented separately from EPA Victoria, DTP and Moorabool Shire Council. This page does not attribute regulatory functions to the AEIC that belong to another authority.

1

Complaint consideration

The historical record establishes that the AEIC considered the Beneficiary's complaint and obtained updates from other parties.

2

Reliance recorded

The Commissioner's June 2025 letter records the EPA position considered when the AEIC concluded it could not assist further.

3

Administrative continuity

The Trustee later supplied the developing and crystallised record so the Commissioner's administrative record reflected the documentary material then available.

Documentary chronology

Beneficiary complaint and Trustee record

The sequence preserves the different capacities and the documentary role of each communication.

Historical context

Earlier Lal Lal Wind Farm complaints and material

The Beneficiary's concerns and complaint history pre-dated the 2025 AEIC case and the later Trustee administrative record. This page confines itself to the documentary items presently published.

9 January 2025

EPA role transition recorded

Carolyn Francis acknowledged receipt of material in her role as Manager – South West, EPA Victoria, advised that EPA would not respond to the package and stated that she would cease working for EPA Victoria on 10 January 2025.

2 March 2025

Complaint to the AEIC

The Commissioner's later letter records that the complaint was made to the AEIC on this date.

11 April 2025

Case-management arrangements

The AEIC advised that another officer would review the case, that Assistant Commissioner Carolyn Francis would not be involved because of her previous involvement in related matters, and that the Commissioner would be briefed.

19 June 2025

Commissioner's response to the Beneficiary

The Commissioner recorded that EPA Victoria had stated the facility was complying with its obligations and that EPA would not take further regulatory action. After considering those matters, the AEIC's terms of reference and the scope of its role, the Commissioner concluded that the AEIC could not assist further.

17 March–14 April 2026

Trustee documentary material and receipt requests

The Trustee provided the Notice, Supporting Record, annexures and associated material for documentary completeness and sought confirmation that the material formed part of the Commissioner's administrative record. No review or action was sought beyond receipt confirmation.

6 July 2026

Crystallised record provided

The Trustee advised that the present phase of the administrative and evidentiary record had been completed and published, and forwarded the crystallisation notice for information only.

17 July 2026

EPA reconciliation notice forwarded

The Trustee forwarded the EPA reconciliation notice solely so the Commissioner's administrative record reflected the present documentary position. No response, review or action was sought.

Administrative continuity

EPA and AEIC documentary roles

The record shows Carolyn Francis in two official capacities: Manager – South West at EPA Victoria in January 2025, and later Assistant Commissioner within the AEIC. The AEIC's April 2025 email expressly records that she would not be involved in the case because of previous involvement in related matters.

Evidentiary limit: The record establishes the positions held, the correspondence received and the case-management arrangement stated by the AEIC. It does not determine the extent of any person's knowledge or draw conclusions about the propriety of the arrangement.
Current documentary position

What the published record establishes

AEIC complaint pathway

The AEIC considered the Beneficiary's complaint and recorded reliance on EPA Victoria's stated regulatory position when deciding that it could not assist further.

Trustee administrative record

The Trustee later kept the AEIC informed of the developing and crystallised documentary record without asking the Commissioner to reopen, review or act upon the complaint.

Scope control: This page records documentary custody, chronology and stated administrative positions. It does not make findings concerning compliance, liability, regulatory validity or the legal effect of any document.